Do you want to understand the Two Parties with One Face? Here is the info that will open doors for you...
             (Be sure and read the 2nd post below for clarity on the party issue...)

Read Historical Error on the 14th Amendment, here is the link : www.pacinlaw.us/error

Also, look at this Section 2 addendum, it is worth it : www.pacinlaw.us/usage

---

Download the grammatical sentence diagramming of Section 2 of the 14th Amendment; it states:

• When a “voter” is denied the right to vote, except for rebellion (or other crimes), that
  “voter” is excluded from the count used for congressional Representatives.

In other words, you are denied the right to vote and not represented, unless you participate in rebellion.  Download

Information on Susan B. Anthony, the woman who challenged the women's right to vote.

The Nineteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution prohibits each state and the federal government from denying any citizen the right to vote based on that citizen's sex. It was ratified on August 18, 1920. It took about 70 years for the completion of the plot, but this phase of communism in America did get done.

It is interesting that about the same time the Communist Manifesto was written and the people from Europe came over here to infiltrate America (the 48ers, the Republicans), that this phase started about 1848:

When the 14th Amendment became part of the U.S. Constitution in July 1868, women's rights leaders—who had been actively campaigning through two decades for women's suffrage—were angered by the wording of Section 2. That section, written to encourage states to give the vote to black males, seemed to place in doubt the citizenship of females by inserting the word "male" into the Constitution for the first time.

Interesting that she was a follower of God, but still wanted to vote for a keeper other than God, the President:

Anthony was born into a devout Quaker family in Adams, Massachusetts on February 15,1820. No toys or music were allowed in the Anthony home for fear that they would distract the children from God's word. Source

The main question of Anthony to promote the agenda was the following:

Anthony saw the four months until her trial as an opportunity to educate the citizens of Rochester and surrounding counties on the issue of women suffrage. She took to the stump, speaking in town after town on the topic, "Is it a Crime for a Citizen of the United States to Vote?" Source

They may have decided that the women did not have the right to vote, but Susan B. Anthony had it wrong: It is a crime for state citizens to vote under Section 2 of the 14th (i.e., they must rebel), not citizens of the United States.

More premeditated garbage that was set-up with the 14th Amendment. The insertion of "male" in Section 2 was put there so this could be done. In other words, it was a tool to advance the 14th Amendment agenda and its law system of agency due process, etc. All part of the communist takeover of the United States of America. This particular communistic action comes under DESTRUCTION OF FAMILY. Also, as the principle for most states (countries) in the Union had land ownership as a prerequisite for participating in elections, this assisted in destroying land ownership and adding property taxation to the middle class via mobocracy, a mandate of communism.

The 48ers (being Marxist monkeys as unwitting tools of the banking elite) came into the United States via New York like most immigrants did, and filtered out throughout the states with the bulk of them landing in the communist state model, Wisconsin. It would be an interesting study to see who programmed Susan B Anthony, and others, to do the bidding of the stealthy "Communist Party", which is currently the Republicans and Democrats (or any party for that matter).

Let us look at another ISM... Gradualism, or the Slowly Cook Froggie principle.

N.Y. TIMES, Oct. 28, 1973 reported that Henry Kissinger said:

"The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer."

---

Information on the 48ers...

• http://comminfo.rutgers.edu/~dalbello/FLVA/activists/48contribs.html

More information on women's rights...

• http://www.savethemales.ca/uw/main.html

Interesting facts about LB Bork...

• LB Bork is fighting communism (capitalism, whatever) from Wisconsin (the base of the 48ers, Republicans), the state that was granted statehood the same year the Communist Manifesto was released, 1848.
• LB Bork is living in the town that provided most of the lead (for bullets) that killed Southern soldiers in the Civil War (a war really against the plot of communist government in the United States).

Quote:

Kind of mixed wording... It seems that the above is to include all/everyone even if they
don't vote, 'cause how could a "voter" be excluded from the count even though they
did "cast a ballot/vote?"

This is where the ominous "registration" part comes into play. So it seems "technically"
that everyone is a "voter", no matter what..and can decide NOT TO PARTICIPATE by simply
not registering, after all, they won't let one vote if not "registered". So, the registration con
sets up the formal admission that one is voluteering for rebellious citizenship.

So unless one "registers", confirming that they wish to be a United States Citizen, and participate
in rebellion their vote is excluded from the count.

Voter registration seems to be the tie that binds one into the citizen, and extinguishes original sovereign
right(s). May be off on this thought, yet seems to make sense.

Quote:

It is very mixed, which gave these black robe reprobates something to toss around (or jerk everyone around with).

And, NO... You are missing the negative nature of the statement. Reverse it: By participating in rebellion, a voter is given the right to vote and he is included in the count for congressional representation.

And for all those MORONS who ignore the 14th Amendment or come up with stupid positions, like it only applies to Negros, and any other worthless positions that allows this CANCER to stay in existence...

• I am starting a list of such people, as the time is long overdue: Hypocritical & Stupid Patriots

First off, everyone is a citizen of the United States. People that say things like the 14th Amendment was not ratified lawfully, or whatever else they come-up with is pointless. Besides Section 1 of the amendment "naturalizing" you at birth by operation of law, it is asked: was/is you father taking benefits as US citizen? Then you are one, as the law prescribes. Another quick litmus test is, have you filled-out any form in your lifetime that is for US citizens? Now let us go over the birth certificate that was issued to you by one of the insurgent states (that are noted in the 14th Amendment)...

Get the idea?

These are all facts of law noted by courts and considered to be within the realm of legal fictions (presumed) if they do not have the direct evidence. People who just moan about everything and make no correction to the above noted effects are US citizens, the voting issue notwithstanding. All such people are in the "Gray Area" and are in essence agreeing with the rebelling voters (see graph below). Anyone that says otherwise is delusional and DO NOT TRUST! They seem to want to ignore the fact of a plethora of statutes, case law, participation by United States citizens, etc. that has gone on for years. see this... There are a number of law maxims that take care of their silence, overt participation, etc.

 

In strict sense, one could assert that the only ones that are represented are voters, as all persons are represented by the formula then is reduced to "such male citizens" overtaking the "whole number of citizens".

In reality, said section is just simply establishing that:

1) To vote in ANY election* you must be a "citizen of the United States"; and,
2) The representation is no longer applied to "state citizens", but now applies to "citizens of the United States".

That it is in a nutshell.

Are you aligned with the Communist Rebels against the lawful bodies politic? I am not. 

_______

* Today, the statutes of the states require you to be a "citizen of the United States" (or US citizen). Moreover, the Section 2 formula mandates that such citizens are voting for the judicial officers of the "14th Amendment States (governments)", hence one is fundamentally agreeing to be governed by the law systems of said states .

Quote:

Thanks for pointing that out LB. I was just trying to get those who don't quite get it yet to exercise some critical thinking skills which seem to be lacking these days (myself included on the critical thinking thing).


Glad I'm one of the "never registered, never voted" minority that needs to
grow into a majority with the proper understanding of why.

(The Red Amendment)

Additional nonsense on this subject that is recent...

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia unintentionally revealed the hypocrisy of the Right’s rhetoric about “originalist” interpretations of the U.S. Constitution with his comments about how the 14th Amendment’s guarantee of “equal protection under the law” doesn’t mean equal rights for women.

“In 1868, when the 39th Congress was debating and ultimately proposing the 14th Amendment, I don't think anybody would have thought that equal protection applied to sex discrimination, or certainly not to sexual orientation,” Scalia said in a recent interview with the legal magazine California Lawyer.

More here...

Trying to redefine citizens are we.

From the article: “The only issue is whether it prohibits it. It doesn't. Nobody ever thought that that's what it meant. Nobody ever voted for that. If the current society wants to outlaw discrimination by sex, hey we have things called legislatures, and they enact things called laws. You don't need a constitution to keep things up-to-date. All you need is a legislature and a ballot box.”

[shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.]