PAC • Not My Government | Forum - So the 14th Amendment does not Matter?

The People's Awareness Coalition Forum

Page LogOn Time : • Greetings, concerned American. Note most topics reserved for members only. We welcome you to Register.

Home

Events

Help

Not My Government | Forum › Island Makers Project › Welcome to Island Makers Project › So the 14th Amendment does not Matter?

Moderator Group: PAC Staff | Moderator: LB Bork

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Thread

So the 14th Amendment does not Matter? (Read 4873 times)

LB Bork

NMG Global Moderator

Posts: 1897

PAC Groups

PAC Staff

SN Society

Git 'er Done!

Gender:

Country of Illinois

So the 14th Amendment does not Matter?
Aug 29th, 2010 at 6:44pm

Politicians
, don’t listen to what they say, watch what they do.

Okay, we admit it... We made Bill say that. It is asked, when has Bill ever told the truth, anyway?!?

Kidding aside, Here's your sign... The 14th Amendment had nothing to do with ex-slaves... Here is what they did...

Some say that the 14th Amendment was not ratified or does not matter? What's all this then? Smiley

The 14th Amendment Use and Analysis : http://www.law.cornell.edu/anncon/html/amdt14toc_user.html

That is a lot of crap!

UNITED STATES v. CRUIKSHANK, 92 U.S. 542 (1875). The citizen cannot complain, because he has voluntarily submitted himself to such a form of government.... he owes allegiance to the two departments (i.e. the 14th Amendment's dual citizenship), so to speak, and within their respective spheres must pay the penalties.

What penalties?

NORDYKE v. KING, 563 F. 3d 439 - Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit (2009). This necessary “right of the people” existed before the Second Amendment as “one of the fundamental rights of Englishmen.” Heller identified several reasons why the militia was considered “necessary to the security of a free state.” First, “it is useful in repelling invasions and suppressing insurrections. Second, it renders large standing armies unnecessary... Third, when the able-bodied men of a nation are trained in arms and organized, they are better able to resist tyranny.” In addition to these civic purposes, Heller characterized the right to keep and bear arms as a corollary to the individual right of self-defense. (“[T]he inherent right of self-defense has been central to the Second Amendment right.”). Thus the right contains both a political component—it is a means to protect the public from tyranny—and a personal component—it is a means to protect the individual from threats to life or limb.

We must trace this right, as thus described, through our history from the Founding...
Until the enactment of the Fourteenth Amendment.

What did that say!