Not My Government | Forum | |
https://notmygovernment.us/forum/NMG.pl
Republic vs. Democracy >> Nothing Happens by Accident >> PAC ~ About Case Law https://notmygovernment.us/forum/NMG.pl?num=1316442316 Message started by LB Bork on Sep 19th, 2011 at 9:26am |
Title: PAC ~ About Case Law Post by LB Bork on Sep 19th, 2011 at 9:26am
The Problem with Case Law
Keeping abreast of the deception of the "Law Industry" and the courts receiving Pension and Bounty (i.e., hush money)* in maintaining that the United States is a nation internally under the 14th Amendment, the following is observed... It has been said that there is no such thing as Federal Common Law. Let us take a brief look at this subject... To start, take a quick look at what the common thought is on the subject of Federal Common Law:
Further, Ballentine's Law Dictionary (3rd edition), citing American Jurisprudence (15 Am J2d Com. L. Sec. 4), stated:
Being there are many facets of "Common Law", the facet in issue here is having a settled decision on a certain matter that may be applied to everyone in all cases that surround such matter. In example, stare decisis is a legal principle by which judges are obliged to respect the precedents established by prior decisions. All well and good in most cases, but the common law principle in regard to precedent is a factor that applies to men and women, not legal entities (as corporations are considered). There must be a separation. As the 14th Amendment treats people as legal entities, some instances may warrant a different status on a man thus causing stare decisis to be disregarded. Wherefore one could say :
Further your study... The "law industry" thinks the United States is a nation (internally), thus thinking that the federal government is a national government. Ergo, their thinking is skewed. Keeping that in mind, more here : A Theory of Federal Common Law * Notes
|
Not My Government | Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.4. YaBB © 2000-2011. All Rights Reserved. |